About | Founding | The Ikoku Holdings

Pink Heart-Shaped Padlock, Titled on its Edge, Against Pink Background

Conditions

of Founding

The Ikoku Holdings was founded by Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku as a protected series within a limited liability company to further his long-standing interests in practices, problems, and products relating to care and creativity, community and ethics. Such interests guide The Ikoku Holdings’s focus, form, and function, especially the means the company division employs to privately hold, manage, and safeguard assets, documents, and equivalently significant properties.

Learn More

Founding

Introduction

The founding of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings has been at the behest and impetus solely of the Founder, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku, and has proceeded as follows:

Founding History

Section 1.1.0. The Alvan Ikoku Holdings was established:

1.1.1. Founding Entity

in 2021 by its sole Founder, Member, Owner and CEO, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku, as a division of The Alvan Ikoku Group LLC, itself similarly established in 2019.

1.1.2. Founding Entities

as part of ongoing work he has carried out for over three decades, leading also to his founding of The Ikoku Charitable Trusts, The Ikoku Foundations, The Ikoku University, Publiks Inc, and Humana Sancta.

1.1.3. Founding Fulfillments

with the understanding that, where appropriate and authorized solely by the Founder, these distinct and independent entities will endeavor to coordinate efforts toward the fulfillment of their respective missions and purposes.

Founding Concerns

Section 1.2.0. The Alvan Ikoku Holdings was also founded and developed in response to the concerns below:

1.2.1. Concern for Care

the Founder’s longstanding concern for issues pertaining to care.

1.2.2. Concern for Creativity

the Founder’s longstanding concern for practices, problems, and products of creativity.

1.2.3. Concern for Community

the Founder’s longstanding concern for communities, both local and global in nature.

1.2.4. Concern for Ethics

the Founder’s longstanding concern for issues pertaining to ethics.

1.2.5. Concern for Humanity

the Founder’s longstanding concern for the human and humane, and attendant concern regarding de- and subhumanizing conduct and resulting instances of inhuman and inhumane treatment, with the Founder’s insights from such concern proving valuable during several periods, preceding and during the formation of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings, where he was subject to inhumane conduct and treatment that entailed persistent, pervasive and profound violations of the confidentiality and privacy, freedom and liberty, independence and integrity, and, ultimately, sanctity of his being, body, and brain, as well as self, soul, and spirit.*

*for further, see Inhumane Conduct section below.

1.2.6. Concern for Indifference

the Founder’s longstanding concern for issues pertaining to difference, with the Founder’s insights from such concern proving valuable during the aforementioned periods of inhuman and inhumane conduct and treatment, with such insights elucidating that — as also experienced by others — such inhumane conduct and treatment depend upon and employ notions of human and perceived difference (including those pertaining to ability, birth, caste, citizenship, culture, ethnicity, gender, medical information, origin, race, religion, and sex) to elicit active and passive indifference as well as support for persistent, pervasive and profound violations of a person’s humanness.

1.2.7. Concern for Spirituality

the Founder’s longstanding concern for the spiritual nature of humans, with further insights from such concern emanating in response to the aforementioned periods, as well as past and present difficulties, even failures of prevailing forms of civics, commerce, education, law, politics, public discourse, and religion to provide a meaningful ethical and moral basis for a good life in contemporary society, one adequate for ensuring the basic human and humane coexistence as well as spiritual and theological equanimity of diverse human beings living in shared societies.

1.2.8. Concern for Vulnerability

the Founder’s longstanding concern for issues pertaining to lessening intractable problems and undue burdens experienced by vulnerable populations due to the aforementioned conduct and treatment, failures to prevent or remedy them, and the limits of processes that privilege majoritarian decision-making, interests, social structures, and views within a given community, institution, or polity.

Founding Mission

Section 1.3.0. The Alvan Ikoku Holdings’s founding mission and purposes are therefore:

1.3.1. To Foster

to foster care and creativity, community and ethics in lives and societies of enduring concern to the Founder.

1.3.2. To Serve

to serve a range of communities touched by the Founder, including through disciplines in which he has trained and practiced.

1.3.3. To Fulfill

to fulfill its mission and purposes as a faith-aligned company, abiding by the basic principles and practices of the Humana Sancta Faith (the “Humana Faith” and “Sancthumanism”).

1.3.4. To Succeed

and to succeed in developing a company — as well as communities — where the aforementioned inhuman and inhumane conduct and treatment are considered incompatible with their principles and values as well as basic civility, decency, dignity and society, and so do not become or remain the means for any act or activity, benefit or good, product or service, mission or purpose.

Section 1.3.5. And The Alvan Ikoku Holdings serves as the company division tasked with:

1.3.6. Secure Management

design, development, implementation, and management of solutions and systems pertaining to security.

1.3.7. Account Management

design, development, implementation, and management of solutions and systems pertaining to accounts.

1.3.8. File Management

administration and safekeeping of books, documents, and files.

1.3.9. Equity Management

administration and safekeeping of intellectual and real property and equivalently significant assets.

Pink Heart-Shaped Padlock, Titled on its Edge, With Bronze Key Next To It, Against Pink Background — Safe and Valued (Towfiqu Barbhuiya)

Focus

Provision

The Alvan Ikoku Holdings has also been developed, and its activities and administration focused, as follows:

Activities and Administration

Section 1.5.0. All acts, activities, affairs, agents, arrangements, assets, and equivalent of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings are administered solely via the Founder, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku, and solely via the Founder’s authorization, as provided for in the Codes and Policies, and thus focused to ensure their alignment with and furtherance of the mission and purposes of the company division. Accordingly, The Alvan Ikoku Holdings’s administration is conducted solely via means limited by the organization’s entity status as:

1.5.1. Faith-Aligned

a faith-aligned division in a faith-aligned company.

1.5.2. For-Profit

a for-profit division in a for-profit company.

1.5.3. Independent

an independent division in an independent company.

1.5.4. Non-Governmental

a non-governmental division in a non-governmental company.

1.5.5. Non-Political, -Partisan

a non-political and non-partisan division in a non-political and non-partisan company.

1.5.6. Non-Public, Private

a non-public and private division in a non-public and private company.

1.5.7. Single-Interestholder

a division in a limited liability company whose interests are wholly held and owned by its sole Member and Founder, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku.

1.5.8. Single-Member

a division in a single-member company, wholly owned by its sole Member and Founder, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku.

Areas and Efforts

Section 1.6.0. The Alvan Ikoku Holdings administers its efforts via four (4) areas of focus:

1.6.1. Secure Management

Secure Management

1.6.2. Account Management

Account Management

1.6.3. File Management

File Management

1.6.4. Equity Management

Equity Management

Faith and Spirituality

Section 1.7.0. The Alvan Ikoku Holdings’s faith-based commitments are focused as follows:

1.7.1. Humana Faith

that none of its acts, activities, agents, arrangements, or equivalent may in any way come in conflict with the Humana Sancta Faith (the “Humana Faith” and “Sancthumanism”) as such faith is administered, defined and interpreted solely by Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku, serving also as sole Founder and Presiding Officer of Humana Sancta.

1.7.2.1. Sanctity of Human, As-Is

that such non-conflict with the Humana Faith align with a belief in the sanctity of each human being as-is.

1.7.2.2. Sanctity of Human, Body

that such non-conflict with the Humana Faith align with a belief that the confidentiality and privacy, freedom and liberty, independence and integrity, and sanctity of each human’s inner being, brain, and body — as well as attendant rights to such — are inalienable, sacrosanct and thus absolute.

1.7.2.3. Sanctity of Human, Spirit

that such non-conflict with the Humana Faith align with a belief that the confidentiality and privacy, freedom and liberty, independence and integrity, and sanctity of each human’s inner self, soul, and spirit — as well as attendant rights to such — are inalienable, sacrosanct and thus absolute.

1.7.2.4. Sanctity of Human, Thoughts

that such non-conflict with the Humana Faith align with a belief that the confidentiality and privacy, freedom and liberty, independence and integrity, and sanctity of each human’s thoughts and mental activities, functions, and tasks, whether conducted in silence or voiced in solitude — and attendant rights to such — are inalienable, sacrosanct and thus absolute.

1.7.2.5. Sanctity of Human, Will

that such non-conflict with the Humana Faith align with a belief that the confidentiality and privacy, freedom and liberty, independence and integrity, and sanctity of each human’s will as to own consciousness, conscience, consent, as well as person — and attendant rights to such — are inalienable, sacrosanct and thus to be fully respected.

1.7.3. Sanctity of Protection

that such non-conflict with the Humana Faith include a faith-based commitment to protect against any infringement of the aforementioned beliefs and rights, including protection against any diminishment of a human’s humanness, humaneness, or humanity, or status and treatment as an equal and full human being as-is.

1.7.4. Sanctity of Provision

that such non-conflict with the Humana Faith include a faith-based commitment to provide for the aforementioned beliefs and rights, resulting in their highest possible level of spiritual and substantive enjoyment, for the Founder and every follower of Humana Sancta, worthy of the respect their humanity requires.

Incompatibility with Founding

Section 1.8.0. The activities, agents, and arrangements of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings are therefore focused and limited via determinations of incompatibility with the company, as delineated below:

1.8.1. Above, Notwithstanding Proviso

firstly, above and notwithstanding any provision of applicable law or regulation, the Codes and Policies, or any equivalent founding or legal documents, no act, activity, agent, arrangement, or equivalent of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings may

1.8.1.1. Above, Notwithstanding, Infringement, Founding

effect, facilitate, or otherwise foster any infringement of the Founding of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings or the Governance of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings, as described in the Codes and Policies (respectively, the “Founding” and the “Governance”).

1.8.1.2. Above, Notwithstanding, Infringement, Faith

effect, facilitate, or otherwise foster any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments.

1.8.1.3. Above, Notwithstanding, Infringement, Policy

effect, facilitate, or otherwise foster any infringement of the Codes and Policies.

1.8.1.4. Above, Notwithstanding, Inhumane Conduct

effect, facilitate, or otherwise foster any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.

1.8.1.5. Above, Notwithstanding Non-Preclusion

with the understanding that the lawfulness, perceived benefit, or equivalent consideration of a given act, activity, agent, arrangement, or equivalent does not preclude its incompatibility or its infringing, inhumane or equivalent nature in relation to The Alvan Ikoku Holdings, which is to be determined solely by the Founder.

1.8.2. Adjudication, Incompatibility

thus, secondly, any such infringing or inhumane activity, agent, or arrangement — as well as any advantage, benefit, information, or property attributed to it — is to be adjudicated solely by the Founder as incompatible with The Alvan Ikoku Holdings itself as well as its founding, governance, and overall administration.

1.8.3. Determination, Incompatibility

thus, thirdly, each activity, agent, and arrangement relating to The Alvan Ikoku Holdings is subject to determinations of incompatibility further delineated below, namely,

1.8.3.1. Determination, Incompatibility, Activities

where the Founder determines that an act or activity effects, facilitates, or otherwise fosters any infringement of the Founding or Governance, any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments, any infringement of the Codes and Policies, or any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.

1.8.3.2. Determination, Incompatibility, Agents

where the Founder determines that an agent effects, facilitates, or otherwise fosters any infringement of the Founding or Governance, any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments, any infringement of the Codes and Policies, or any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.

1.8.3.3. Determination, Incompatibility, Arrangements

where the Founder determines that an arrangement effects, facilitates, or otherwise fosters any infringement of the Founding or Governance, any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments, any infringement of the Codes and Policies, or any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.

1.8.3.4. Determination, Incompatibility, Persons, Natural

where the Founder determines that a natural person effects, facilitates, or otherwise fosters any infringement of the Founding or Governance, any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments, any infringement of the Codes and Policies, or any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.

1.8.3.5. Determination, Example, Persons, Natural

as has been determined, among natural persons, in the cases of Eleanor Marie Brown (AB, Brown; JD, Yale) of Jamaica and the United States of America; Rafael Nadal Parera of Manacor, Mallorca, Spain; Cristiano Ronaldo dos Santos Aveiro of Funchal, Madeira, Portugal; and Jeff Williams of Telegraph Hill, San Francisco, California, United States of America, as well as the agents of the aforementioned and analogous, identical or similar persons engaged in analogous, identical or similar conduct;

1.8.3.6. Determination, Incompatibility, Persons, Legal

where the Founder determines that a legal person effects, facilitates, or otherwise fosters any infringement of the Founding or Governance, any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments, any infringement of the Codes and Policies, or any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.

1.8.3.7. Determination, Example, Persons, Legal

as has been determined, among legal persons, in the cases of Leland Stanford Jr University of Palo Alto, California, United States of America and The New York Times Company of New York City, New York, United States of America, as well as the agents of the aforementioned and analogous, identical or similar persons engaged in analogous, identical or similar conduct;

1.8.3.8. Determination, Incompatibility, Persons, Public

where the Founder determines that a government, political, public or state authority, entity, office, or person effects, facilitates, or otherwise fosters any infringement of the Founding or Governance, any infringement of the aforementioned faith-based commitments, any infringement of the Codes and Policies, or any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.

1.8.3.9. Determination, Example, Persons, Public

as has been determined, among political persons, in the cases of the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States of America; Former President Barack Hussein Obama (AB, Columbia; JD, Harvard) of Honolulu, Hawaii and Chicago, Illinois, United States of America; and the Democratic Party of San Francisco, of California, and of the United States of America, as well as the agents of the aforementioned and analogous, identical or similar persons engaged in analogous, identical or similar conduct;

1.8.4. Determination, Incompatible, Consequence

thus, fourthly, subsequent to the Founder’s determination of incompatibility, such activity, agent, arrangement, or person is to be deemed unauthorized and unqualified — entailing, where applicable, the revocation of any authorization or qualification — to be an activity, agent, arrangement, or person of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings, in any capacity, especially that pertaining to decision-making, leadership, membership, stakeholding, or voting, and in any way as part of its administration, or as a recipient of any assets, contract, funding, properties, support, work, or equivalent.

1.8.5. Incompatibility, Reporting, Informing Founder

and upon discovery by any person of any indication, instance, or possibility of incompatibility, such person must directly report to and fully inform the Founder of such issues.

1.8.6. Incompatibility, Sole Adjudicator, Founder

with the understanding that the Founder is the sole person with powers to conduct inquiries, investigations, and other proceedings regarding such issues and make adjudications and determinations of compatibility or incompatibility, confirmed and executed only via the Founder’s authorization.

Inhumane Conduct

Section 1.9.0. The aforementioned inhumane conduct include the behaviors delineated below, properly understood to not only treat a person inhumanely but to also risk rendering the treater inhumane, and so they are to be absent from any and all acts, activities, agents, arrangements, and equivalent relating to The Alvan Ikoku Holdings, and are not to be effected, facilitated or fostered in any way or via any manner, means, method, or mode, or to any degree:

1.9.1. Denial, Autonomy

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s autonomy, rights to autonomy, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful consent or decision-making for the self.

1.9.2. Denial, Confidentiality

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s confidentiality, rights to confidentiality, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for confidences or confidential acts, affairs, matters, relations, or services.

1.9.2.1. Denial, Confidentiality, Body

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s confidentiality of body and person, rights to confidentiality of body and person, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for being confidential or living confidentially, by or with oneself, with absolute confidentiality and thus without disclosure or dissemination.

1.9.2.2. Denial, Confidentiality, Mind

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s confidentiality of mind and thought, rights to confidentiality of mind and thought, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for cognizing or thinking confidentially, by, to or with oneself, with absolute confidentiality and thus without disclosure or dissemination.*

1.9.2.3. Denial, Confidentiality, Speech

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s confidentiality of conversation and speech, rights to confidentiality of conversation and speech, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for conversing or speaking confidentially, by, to or with oneself, with absolute confidentiality and thus without disclosure or dissemination.

1.9.3. Denial, Dignity

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s dignity, rights to dignity, or protections of such — via public debasement or degradation, social excoriation or stripping.

1.9.4. Denial, Equality

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s consideration, recognition, and treatment as equally and fully human, and so deserving of a fundamental reciprocity — to not do to that person what is not done simultaneously to each and every human being, or what would not be done to oneself or one’s most loved one.

1.9.5. Denial, Freedom

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s freedom, rights to freedom, or protections of such — via any means of de facto or de jure enslavement, forced labor, or indentured servitude.

1.9.5.1. Denial, Freedom, Body

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s freedom of body and person, rights to freedom of body and person, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for being free or living freely, by or with oneself, with absolute freedom and thus without coercion or constraint.

1.9.5.2. Denial, Freedom, Mind

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s freedom of mind and thought, rights to freedom of mind and thought, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for cognizing or thinking freely, by, to or with oneself, with absolute freedom and thus without coercion or constraint.*

1.9.5.3. Denial, Freedom, Speech

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s freedom of conversation and speech, rights to freedom of conversation and speech, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for conversing or speaking freely, by, to or with oneself, with absolute freedom and thus without coercion or constraint.

1.9.6. Denial, Liberty

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s liberty, rights to liberty, or protections of such — via any means of de facto or de jure disenfranchisement, arbitrary or undue imposition by a community or state.

1.9.6.1. Denial, Liberty, Body

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s liberty of body and person, rights to liberty of body and person, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for being libertied or living liberally, by or with oneself, with absolute liberty and thus without imposition or intrusion.

1.9.6.2. Denial, Liberty, Mind

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s liberty of mind and thought, rights to liberty of mind and thought, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for cognizing or thinking liberally, by, to or with oneself, with absolute liberty and thus without imposition or intrusion.*

1.9.6.3. Denial, Liberty, Speech

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s liberty of conversation and speech, rights to liberty of conversation and speech, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for conversing or speaking liberally, by, to or with oneself, with absolute liberty and thus without imposition or intrusion.

1.9.7. Denial, Privacy

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s privacy, rights to privacy, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for private life or private acts, affairs, matters, relations, or services.

1.9.7.1. Denial, Privacy, Body

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s privacy of body and person, rights to privacy of body and person, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for being private or living privately, by or with oneself, with absolute privacy and thus without detection or dissemination.

1.9.7.2. Denial, Privacy, Mind

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s privacy of mind and thought, rights to privacy of mind and thought, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for cognizing or thinking privately, by, to or with oneself, with absolute privacy and thus without detection or dissemination.*

1.9.7.3. Denial, Privacy, Speech

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s privacy of conversation and speech, rights to privacy of conversation and speech, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for conversing or speaking privately, by, to or with oneself, with absolute privacy and thus without detection or dissemination.

1.9.8. Denial, Private Property, Work

the denial or pervasive infringement of a human being’s private property or work, rights to private property or work, or protections of such — via the preclusion of meaningful opportunity or possibility for personal or private labor, office or work space, opportunity or pursuit, remuneration or value.

1.9.9. Exhibition, Exposure

the exhibition or exposure of a human being — via a totalizing regime that provides other persons, even the greater public, an unconsented surfeit of access and information regarding the human being, while systemically withholding basic, fundamental and necessary information from the human for ceasing any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct.

1.9.10. Experimentation, Testing

the experimentation, research, or testing on a human being — especially for any benefits or purposes or via any means or methods that are not fully informed or unconsented.

1.9.11. Extortion, Ransom

the extortion or ransom of a human being.

1.9.12. Harassment, Stalking

the persistent or pervasive harassment, stalking, or tracking of a human being.

1.9.13. Harm, Injuring

the insistent or persistent physical, physiological or psychological abuse, harm, or injury of a human being.

1.9.14. Human Use, Instrumentality

the instrumental use of a human being as means to others’s ends.

1.9.15. Human Utility, Utilitarianism

the utilitarian use or utility of a human being for the greater good or the increased or maximal gain of a community, field, group, or state.

1.9.16. Indifference, Cruelty

the cruel or depravedly indifferent treatment of a human being — via maleficence, malfeasance, or malevolence meant to incur pain or suffering.

1.9.17. Isolation, Marginalization

the isolation or marginalization of a human being from humans — and vice versa — via any means of ostracizing or scapegoating, stigmatization or vilification.

1.9.18. Persecution, Prejudiced

the insistent or persistent persecution of a human being — for any aims or purposes or via any means or methods that are explicitly based on or motivated by bias, discrimination, prejudice, or equivalent.

1.9.19. Sporting, Toying

the sporting or toying with a human being — via any means of amusing or entertaining oneself, betting, chasing, competing, gambling, gaming, hunting, or racing against the unconsenting human.

1.9.20. Surveillance, Mind

the detection, dissemination, monitoring, policing, recording, reporting, surveillance, tracking, transmission, or equivalent of a human being’s thoughts and other activities, functions, and tasks of the brain and mind.*

1.9.21. Targeting, as Conditions

the targeting of a human being to make any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct a condition of advancement, affiliation, association, care, existence, learning, life, participation, research, service, support, training, wealth, work, or equivalent — especially where it is not such a condition for every other person.

1.9.22. Targeting, as Means

the targeting of a human being to make any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct a means for acquiring, disenfranchising, claiming, coercing, coopting, creating, intruding or participating in, sharing, stealing, taking over, usurping, or otherwise engaging in the administration, control, development, ownership, or equivalent of any asset, interest, property, share, stock, or equivalent of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings or the Founder, Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku, or any other entity, office, or person.

1.9.23. Totalitarianism, Incremental

the enabling of a community, entity, office, person, sector, or state to subject a human being to any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct, and thus instantiate incremental, often de facto forms of totalitarianism.†

1.9.24. Tyranny, Incremental

the enabling of a community, entity, office, person, sector, or state to choose, decide, or vote to subject a human being to any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct, and thus instantiate incremental, often de facto forms of tyranny.‡

*. Note

* with the understanding that protected activities, functions, and tasks of the brain and mind include, but are not limited to, those of cognition, communication, conscience, consciousness, dreaming, emotion, ideation, memory, perception, physiology, sensation, signaling, thought, and equivalent.

†. Note

† with the understanding that totalitarianism develops where private or public infringement has become so pervasive, or totalizing, as to erase or override distinctions between personal, private, public and state, or render a human’s activities or affairs, being, body, or brain, self, soul, or spirit the domains, properties, utilities, or equivalent of others.

‡. Note

‡ with the understanding that tyranny develops where private or public governance, often via misleadingly evoking ‘we the people,’ has become so arbitrary as to revert to acting as a government of peoples, not of laws (cf. John Adams, John Stuart Mill, Alexis de Tocqueville).

Intrinsic Refusals

Section 1.10.0. In light, therefore, of the aforementioned, incompatibility with The Alvan Ikoku Holdings entails the following basic refusals, each intrinsic to the basic humanity, humanness, and humaneness of each human being, including the Founder, and to the respect such humanity requires:

1.10.1. Basic Refusal, Inhumane Conduct

that The Alvan Ikoku Holdings and the Founder resolutely refuse to give any agreement, assent, authorization, consent, license, permission, or equivalent — or to waive any attendant decisions or rights — for any of the aforementioned inhumane conduct, in any way, via any manner, means, method, or mode, to any degree, under any circumstances, for any period, or for any perceived benefit, end, goal, good, interest, mission, need, objective, purpose, reason, or equivalent.

1.10.2. Basic Refusal, Inhumane Use, Utility

that The Alvan Ikoku Holdings and the Founder resolutely refuse to give any agreement, authorization, assent, consent, license, permission, or equivalent — or to waive any attendant decisions or rights — for any access or use of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings or Founder, or any of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings’s or the Founder’s activities, affairs, agents, arrangements, or assets, or being, body or brain, or self, soul, or spirit, or any equivalent, with the effect or intent of construing, employing or otherwise using the Founder — or any human being — instrumentally or utilitarianly, as a means or medium, for a greater good or to an end of another person or any association, community, field, group, polity, public, or society of persons, in any way, via any manner, means, method, or mode, to any degree, under any circumstances, for any period, or for any perceived benefit, end, goal, good, interest, mission, need, objective, purpose, reason, or equivalent.

1.10.3. Basic Refusal, Intrusive Access

that The Alvan Ikoku Holdings and the Founder resolutely refuse to give any agreement, assent, authorization, consent, license, permission, or equivalent — or to waive any attendant decisions or rights — for any access to, entry or intrusion into, or recording or transmission of the administration of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings or Founder, or any of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings’s or the Founder’s activities, affairs, agents, arrangements, assets, or any equivalent, in any way, via any manner, means, method, or mode, to any degree, under any circumstances, for any period, or for any perceived benefit, end, goal, good, interest, mission, need, objective, purpose, reason, or equivalent.

1.10.4. Basic Refusals as Principle

that these four basic refusals — at once human and humane — together constitute a fundamental limiting and restricting principle, and wherever there is conflict or question, legally override and supersede any conflicting clause or interpretation of any alleged, assumed, construed, presumed or otherwise made or understood agreement, arrangement, article, assent, authorization, bylaw, choice, code, consent, contract, decision, guideline, law, license, order, permission, policy, principle, provision, regulation, right, term, vote, warrant, or equivalent.

SingleKeyMattArtzAug2017 — Domains (Matt Artz)

Form

Provision

The Alvan Ikoku Holdings’s organizational form is as delineated below:

Formation

Section 1.12.0. The Alvan Ikoku Holdings is formally organized as a protected series of The Alvan Ikoku Group LLC — itself a series limited liability company — as provided for in the laws of the State of Delaware, United States, and it is registered and headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware.

Names

Section 1.13.0. The Alvan Ikoku Holdings is also officially known under the business names, The Alvan Azinna Chibuzo Ikoku Holdings and The Ikoku Holdings. All three names, as used in official Ikoku Group and Ikoku Holdings documents, products, programs, services and sites, refer to the same aforementioned divisional entity.

Divisions

Section 1.14.0. As provided for under law for series limited liability companies, The Ikoku Group uses its series as a means to structure its operations into the five (5) divisions delineated below:

1.14.1. Ikoku Corporation

Ikoku Corporation

1.14.2. Ikoku Holdings

Ikoku Holdings

1.14.3. Ikoku Services

Ikoku Services

1.14.4. Ikoku Philanthropies

Ikoku Philanthropies

1.14.5. Publiks Group

Publiks Group

Efforts

Section 1.15.0. The Ikoku Group, via its divisions, is thus structured to carry out efforts in the aforementioned areas, and to ultimately fulfill its founding mission to foster care and creativity, community and ethics in disciplines and among peoples of enduring concern to the Founder. As always, the objective is the improvement of lives and the betterment of societies.

Conclusion

— Conditions and Terms

— 1.16.1. All of the aforementioned in this section constitutes the Conditions and Terms of Founding of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings (the “Conditions and Terms of Founding” and “Conditions of Founding”) and forms an integral part of the Conditions and Terms of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings, the Codes and Policies of The Alvan Ikoku Holdings, as well as The Ikoku Holdings Conduct and Service Agreement you may enter into with The Alvan Ikoku Holdings.

— Concerns and Questions

— 1.16.2. Please report any concerns about code or policy violations, and send any questions you may have regarding the Conditions of Founding or The Ikoku Holdings Conduct and Service Agreement, to policies@ikokuholdings.com.

— Concluding

— 1.16.3. And as a concluding aviso and proviso, you are informed as well as reminded that by commencing or continuing any conduct or service relating to The Alvan Ikoku Holdings — in any way, either directly or indirectly, and via any manner, means, method, or mode — you enter into The Ikoku Holdings Conduct and Service Agreement and agree to abide by and be legally bound by the Policy conditions, principles, protections, and terms described above, and the Codes and Policies, in their entirety without modification or severability, as amended from time to time solely by the Founder.

CalipersMattArtzAug2017 — Measures (Matt Artz)

Also at the Division

The Ikoku Holdings and its parent company, The Ikoku Group, are dedicated to developing, providing, and safekeeping ideas and solutions — with the mission to foster care and community, culture and creativity, ethics and innovation in lives and societies. And so in accordance with the above, The Ikoku Group and Ikoku Holdings provide the following:

A Company of Care and Community

A company and divisions committed to developing and ultimately providing ideas, practices, and products fostering care and community — for the benefit and service of people coexisting in local and global communities.

II.

A Company of Culture and Creativity

A company and divisions committed to developing and ultimately providing ideas, practices, and products fostering culture and creativity — for the benefit and enjoyment of people engaging in and with local and global communities.

III.

A Company of Ethics and Innovation

A company and divisions committed to developing and ultimately providing innovation that abides by ethics principles and protections — for the benefit and humane use of people employing our solutions for local and global concerns.

More About Us

The Ikoku Holdings

About Us • Governance • Policies

Care

Creativity

Ethics

Cookie	Duration	Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

Founding

Introduction

Founding History

Founding Concerns

Founding Mission

Focus

Provision

Activities and Administration

Areas and Efforts

Faith and Spirituality

Incompatibility with Founding

Inhumane Conduct

Intrinsic Refusals

Form

Provision

Formation

Names

Divisions

Efforts

Conclusion

— Conditions and Terms

— Concerns and Questions

— Concluding

Also at the Division

A Company of Care and Community

A Company of Culture and Creativity

A Company of Ethics and Innovation

The Ikoku Holdings

Respecting You, Our Policies